INFLUENCERS AS DIGITAL LABOR IN LOCAL TOURISM DEVELOPMENT

Authors

  • Heni Indrayani Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang, Jawa Tengah
  • Candra Yudha Satriya Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang, Jawa Tengah
  • Agus Triyono Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang, Jawa Tengah
  • Nadia Itona Siregar Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang, Jawa Tengah
  • Anita Amaliyah Universitas Tidar, Magelang, Jawa Tengah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59408/jnk.v4i1.74

Keywords:

digital labor, GenPi, Influencer, Local Tourism, Phenomenology

Abstract

The tourism sector is a priority driving the regional economy. One effort to build tourism is through the popularity of influencers who can be an alternative used indirectly to re-promote regional tourist destinations. Influencers actively utilize digital media as well-known as digital workers. This research explores the phenomenon of social media influencers in relation to digital workers regarding freedom as content creators and content commodification. Therefore, this research aims to describe the phenomenon of Influencers as Digital Workers in Indonesian Tourism Development in terms of content creation, content production and freedom in selecting tourism content. The method in this research is a qualitative research method with a phenomenological approach based on the concepts of digital labor, social media influencers and tourism development. Primary data from interviews with six local influencers who are members and ambassadors of the Generasi Pesona Indonesia (GenPI) community. Secondary data was obtained through journals, e-books, books, blogs and informant’s social media. To code the interview manuscript and create the co-manuscript networks, we used atlas.ti . The research results show that the communication process by influencers begins with input including content production competencies, content distribution competencies, interaction competencies, public persona, relationship quality and ability to influence. Then in terms of the role of local influencers as content creators, multiplicators, moderators and protagonists. Meanwhile, the output produced by local influencers is in the form of content, reach, interaction, personalization, peer effect, authenticity and credibility. In addition, the outcome is content distribution on various digital media platforms. Finally, in terms of impact, it includes networking and interaction.

References

Bassano, C., Barile, S., Piciocchi, P., Spohrer, J. C., Iandolo, F., & Fisk, R. (2019). Storytelling about Places: Tourism Marketing in the Digital Age. Cities, 87, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.025

Coeckelbergh, M. (2018). Technology and the good society: A polemical essay on social ontology, political principles, and responsibility for technology. Technology in Society, 52, 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.12.002

Enke, N., & Borchers, N. S. (2019). Social Media Influencers in Strategic Communication: A Conceptual Framework for Strategic Social Media Influencer Communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(4), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2019.1620234

Fianto, A. Y. A., & Andrianto, N. (2022). Sustainable tourism development from the perspective of digital communication. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi (Indonesian Journal of Communications Studies), 6(1), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v6i1.3648

Fosso Wamba, S., Bawack, R. E., Guthrie, C., Queiroz, M. M., & Carillo, K. D. A. (2021). Are We Preparing for a Good AI Society? A Bibliometric Review and Research Agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120482

Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital Labour and Karl Marx. Routledge.

Fuchs, C. (2016). Reading Marx in the Information Age. Routledge.

Fuchs, C., & Sevignani, S. (2013). What is Digital Labour? What is Digital Work? What’s their Difference? And why do these Questions Matter for Under-standing Social Media? Triple C, 11(2), 237–293. http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Thessalonians+3%3A1-

Guy, J. S. (2019). Digital technology, digital culture and the metric/nonmetric distinction. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.005

Hudders, L., De Jans, S., & De Veirman, M. (2021). The Commercialization of Social Media Stars: a Literature Review and Conceptual Framework on the Strategic Use of Social Media Influencers. International Journal of Advertising, 40(3), 327–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2020.1836925

Jin, S. V., Muqaddam, A., & Ryu, E. (2019). Instafamous and Social Media Influencer Marketing. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 37(5), 567–579. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-09-2018-0375

Jones, P. E. (2018). Karl Marx and the language sciences – critical encounters: introduction to the special issue. Language Sciences, 70, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2018.08.003

Kushlev, K., Proulx, J. D. E., & Dunn, E. W. (2017). Digitally Connected, Socially Disconnected: The Effects of Relying on Technology Rather than Other People. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.001

Lei, W. S. (Clara), Suntikul, W., & Chen, Z. (2023). Tourism development induced social change. Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annale.2023.100088

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenology Research Method. Sage Publications.

Phillips, F., Yu, C. Y., Hameed, T., & El Akhdary, M. A. (2017). The knowledge society’s origins and current trajectory. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 1(3), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2017.08.001

Schyff, K. van der, Flowerday, S., & Furnell, S. (2020). Duplicitous social media and data surveillance: An evaluation of privacy risk. Computers and Security, 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2020.101822

Sharma, A., Pulido-Fernández, J. I., & Hassan, A. (2020). Sustainable Destination Branding and Marketing: Strategies for Tourism Development. CABI. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=RonHDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&dq=marketing+the+school&ots=nb64sqH6VL&sig=IsGUT1iH8Ul3YrpR72ucPPmermM

Sitepu, E., & Sabrin. (2020). Strategi Komunikasi dalam Meningkatkan Minat Berwisata di Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Massage Komunikasi, 9(1), 28–44.

Szewczyk, A. (2021). Measuring the impact of ICT on society. Methodological aspects. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 3165–3175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.089

Törhönen, M., Giertz, J., Weiger, W. H., & Hamari, J. (2021). Streamers: The new wave of digital entreprenurship? Extant corpus and future research agenda. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.101027

van Dijck, J. (2019). Governing digital societies: Private platforms, public values. Computer Law and Security Review, xxxx, 10–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105377

Walton, N., & Nayak, B. S. (2021). Rethinking of Marxist perspectives on big data, artificial intelligence (AI) and capitalist economic development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120576

Downloads

Published

16-06-2025

How to Cite

Indrayani, H., Candra Yudha Satriya, Agus Triyono, Nadia Itona Siregar, & Anita Amaliyah. (2025). INFLUENCERS AS DIGITAL LABOR IN LOCAL TOURISM DEVELOPMENT. Jurnal Netnografi Komunikasi, 4(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.59408/jnk.v4i1.74